Preface: Martin Prouix, President of Pyxis and an organizational coach, posted this article on his blog, Analytical-Mind.com, this past fall. I thought Martin’s thoughts on team performance were worth sharing.
Jean
In addition to working on a new Vision…and establishing new strategies, I’m operating a small cultural transition. [D]espite our success, there are a few areas for performance improvement.
As such, I believe there are 3 behaviors that are preventing our organization and the various teams from reaching the “High Performance Team” level (The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization). My attempt to increase the teams’ (and the entire organization) performance level is by focusing on the following 3 behaviors:
- Setting clear agreements
- Eliminating gossips
- Operating with integrity
Why focus on these 3 behaviors?
Let me start with a simple example to highlight what typically happens in many (including ours) organizations. You will certainly quickly understand why this is dysfunctional and can easily lead to sub-optimal performance. I invite you to follow a typical conversation…
- Sarah: “Mi Mark, I’ve been having issues with payments from a customer. Can you help me?”
- Mark, in the middle of typing an email: ” Sorry, I wasn’t listening. You need help with something Sarah?”
- Sarah: “Yes Mark, we have sent reminders to your customer but still haven’t received any payment. Since you are the account manager for this customer, I was wondering if you can help me?”
- Mark: “Yeah. Well, of course. What do you need me to do?”
- Sarah: “I don’t know. Maybe you can give them a call to see why they aren’t paying their latest invoice.”
- Mark: “OK. I have a few things to take care of today. I should be able to help you”.
- Sarah, walking away: “Alright. Thanks.”
- [3 days later]
- Sarah, talking to herself: “I can’t believe it. I asked Mark to help me with something important and he still didn’t get back to me. Doesn’t he understand that receiving payments is important for our company. It’s always like this with him, he says “yes” but never does anything.”
- [Sarah enters the coffee room]
- Mary, smiling: “Hi Sarah. How are you today?”
- Sarah, clearly upset: “Not good. Mark is so unreliable. I asked him to help me contact a customer and he still hasn’t done anything. It’s been 3 days already.”
- Mary, nodding: “I understand what you are saying. I’ve asked him to contact a customer to invite them to an upcoming conference and he still hasn’t done anything. It’s over 2 weeks already.”
- Sarah, pouring milk in her coffee: “Why is it that we have to do everything around here?”
- Mary, approving: “You know, Mark is not the only one. Do you know that I’m waiting for Don to submit new content for the web site? It’s been 10 days already and Don hasn’t done anything. I don’t know what to do!”
- Don, entering the room to get a coffee: “Good morning ladies!”
- Sarah, walking away with a cup of warm coffee: “Good morning Don. Have a good day!”
- Mary, smiling to Don: “Hi Don, how was the hockey game last night?”
- [For 15 minutes, Don and Mary continue their conversation about the hockey game]
- Mary, walking away with a donut and a coffee: “Nice talking to you Don. Have a good day!”
I doubt that these conversations only take place within our organization but what I’ve noticed is that they are detrimental to high performance. Here’s what’s wrong with this story:
- Lack of clearly defined agreements – who does what? by when?;
- Absence of difficult conversations – when commitments are broken, people don’t have open discussions around the situation at hand;
- Talking to others about someone else’s issues – people resort to involving third parties in a situation that would better be resolved between those who had an agreement;
- Not living up to the promise – commitments are taken lightly and there are no consequences for not delivering on them.
So here’s what I’m proposing to the teams in an attempt to take the organization to the next level.
Setting clear agreements
It is critical to establish clear agreements in order to avoid disappointment and mis-trust. To obtain a commitment and make sure that people have a true agreement, it is critical to make a clear proposal that can:
- Be accepted in full;
- Be rejected completely;
- Be renegotiated.
Once the agreement has taken place, each party must then honor its commitments.
Eliminating gossips
“Gossip is idle talk or rumour, especially about the personal or private affairs of others. It forms one of the oldest and most common means of sharing (unproven) facts and views, but also has a reputation for the introduction of errors and other variations into the information transmitted. The term also carries implications that the news so transmitted (usually) has a personal or trivial nature, as opposed to normal conversation [...] The term is sometimes used to specifically refer to the spreading of dirt and misinformation “ – Wikipedia.Instead of pretending to address a situation by involving a third party, eliminate gossip and go directly to the person with whom there is an issue and work at resolving it with them.
Operating with integrity
“integrity is the inner sense of “wholeness” deriving from qualities such as honesty and consistency of character. As such, one may judge that others “have integrity” to the extent that one judges whether they behave according to the values, beliefs and principles they claim to hold “ - Wikipedia.For me, integrity is very simple as it means to “Do what I say and say what I do”.
Finally, in the possible event that someone can no longer deliver on their commitment, they must inform the other party as soon as they realize they won’t meet their commitment and re-open the agreement.
This may seem trivial and very simple to implement but I doubt any organization has actually been able to implement these behaviors on a large scale. I trust that we will become a highly performing organization once we are successful at doing this.
————————————————————————————————————————————-
Orignally posted by Martin Proux on 11/15/2010 at http://analytical-mind.com/2010/11/15/3-behavior-changes-to-increase-team-performance/. Reprinted with permission.
Martin Proux is President of Pyxis, a software development consulting and coaching firm located in Canada. The firm “helps software development companies to become places where results, quality of life, and fun coexist sustainably by being first and foremost an example of what it proposes to its clients and by coaching them.” Pyxis is one of the few organizations that I have heard about that successfully use self-managing rather than hierarchically organized teams to get their work done.
Filed under: building effective relationships • conscious use of self • healthy organizations • making positive changes • workplace dynamics
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!


Thanks for reposting this article on Team Performance.
I notice from the 3 behaviors that the first one is the most impactful. Setting clear agreements can be challenging sometimes, especially when you leave from a meeting and assume you understand what the role or task was only to find out later after completing the task that you did not live up to the other person’s expectations. This can then easily lead to gossip within teams, organizations, etc if that person does not meet expectations.
My question is: can anyone truly avoid/eliminate gossip? As we are only accountable for our own actions and behaviors, being authentic and honest, and examining our own assumptions and feelings.
What a great question, Alicia. “Can anyone truly avoid/eliminate gossip?” — I don’t regard this or anything else as a 0 or 100% situation. We cannot eliminate *all* gossip and we are not accountable for others’ actions, but we can do our part in reducing the likelihood of it happening around us. One way is by not spreading it ourselves. Another is by (gently) asking people to test their assumption that the gossip they are repeating is actually true.
I personally inadvertently spread gossip last week when I repeated to a group of people some gossip I had heard about a TV talk show host. Turns out, the story I had gotten had been inaccurate and omitted a critical piece of information. Once I realized my error, I e-mailed a retraction to those who had heard my wrong statement. Embarrassing? Yes, it was. But I couldn’t let the distortion stand. I regard it as my responsibility to spread the truth, not distortions.
What do you think about this? Does this address your question?
With regards to all three issues removal of existing paradigms and a clear and central focus on greater principles and ideals is essentially the only way to effectively deal with all three. Where the focus remains steadily on growing individuals toward an ideal, each person then becomes more decisive in their purpose ever reaching for clarity of focus with ever diminishing reaction to trivial event or actions and are continually striving for integrity in their own words and actions.
I like the way you put this, Judy B. Yes, clarity and focus help us discern what’s more important from what.s less important.